Podcast Storyboard: Monorepo Build Systems
Podcast Storyboard: Monorepo Build Systems
Introduction
- Slide: Title and Introduction to the Topic
- Brief overview of monorepo build systems
Depth-First Recursive Build Systems
- Slide: Explanation of Depth-First Recursive Approach
- Describe how Maven uses a depth-first recursive strategy
- Demo: Show Maven build process in an IDE
- Highlight the recursive nature of the build
- Slide: Pros and Cons of Depth-First Recursive Systems
- Discuss advantages and potential drawbacks
- Why is it used and by whom?
DAG Style Build Systems
- Slide: Explanation of DAG Approach
- Explain how DAG systems build from leaves to roots
- Demo: Show DAG build process using shell scripts
- Demonstrate the non-recursive, graph-based build
- Slide: Pros and Cons of DAG Systems
- Discuss benefits and limitations
Speed Comparison
- Slide: Importance of Build Speed
- Emphasize the impact of build speed on development
- Demo: Run both build systems twice to show speed-up
- Compare initial and subsequent build times
- Slide: Analysis of Results
- Analyze the speed improvements and their implications
AIDER SUGGESTIONS:
1 Introduction:
• Add a brief overview of what the audience can expect to learn by the end of the video. This sets clear expectations and goals.
2 Depth-First Recursive Build Systems:
• Include a brief explanation of why this approach is commonly used and its historical context. This can provide viewers with a better understanding of its significance.
3 DAG Style Build Systems:
• Consider adding a comparison table or visual aid to quickly highlight the differences between the depth-first and DAG approaches. This can help viewers grasp the distinctions more easily.
4 Speed Comparison:
• Include a visual representation of the speed comparison results, such as a bar chart or graph. This can make the data more digestible and impactful.
5 Comparing Features:
• Provide specific examples or case studies where each build system excels. This can help viewers relate the concepts to real-world scenarios.
6 Conclusion:
• Summarize the key takeaways in bullet points for clarity. This can reinforce the main points and make them easier to remember.
7 Interactive Q&A Session:
• Consider preparing a few common questions and answers in advance to guide the session and ensure it remains focused and informative.
8 Transitions:
• Plan smooth transitions between different sections, especially when switching between code, command line, and diagrams. This can help maintain the flow and keep the audience engaged.
9 Call to Action:
• End with a call to action, encouraging viewers to explore further resources or try implementing the concepts in their projects.
Compating Features
- Slide: Comparing Build Systems
- Discuss the differences between your shell script system and Buck/Bazel/Nx
- Slide: Fine-Grained Dependency Management
- Highlight how your system achieves fine-grained management
- Compare with other systems
Conclusion
- Slide: Summary of Key Points
- Recap the main takeaways from the presentation
- Interactive Q&A Session
- Engage with the audience to answer questions